Akhmetova G.F. Trends in Urbanization Processes in the National Republics of the Ural-Volga Region During the Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries

Posted on 28.12.2025 by editor

Download (pdf)

Original article

https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.017.2025.04.496-512
https://elibrary.ru/lkyfvu
УДК / UDC 314.8(470.4+470.5)

Trends in Urbanization Processes in the National Republics of the Ural-Volga Region During the Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries

G. F. Akhmetova
Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, Russian Federation
Institute of Strategic Researches of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan, Ufa, Russian Federation

Abstract

Introduction. Urbanization constitutes a significant factor shaping the contemporary state and future trajectories of a nation’s demographic and social development. The consequences of urbanization processes include the expansion of cities, the intensification of agglomeration trends, and alterations in the size, distribution, and composition of the population. The latter is of particular relevance for the Indigenous peoples of the national republics of the Ural-Volga region – specifically the Finno-Ugric and Turkic groups – who experienced a relatively late integration into the urban milieu. The objective of this research is to identify the key patterns in the distribution, dynamics, and proportion of the urban population within the national republics of the Ural-Volga region from the second half of the 20th century to the early 21st century. This article provides a novel comparative analysis of urbanization processes, examining both the general population and the Indigenous peoples of these republics through an ethnic lens for the period under review.

Materials and Methods. Using descriptive statistics, the author analyzes data from the 1989, 2002, 2010, and 2020 Soviet and Russian national censuses, current demographic records, and regional strategic planning documents to identify key trends in agglomeration processes. The analysis focuses on six national republics of the Ural-Volga region: those with indigenous Finno-Ugric (Mari El, Mordovia, Udmurtia) and Turkic populations (Bashkortostan, Tatarstan, Chuvashia).

Results and Discussion. The republics under examination exhibit a center-periphery pattern in the development of their urban settlement networks. A distinct group of core cities has emerged, situated within the most socio-economically advanced territories of these republics, where agglomeration processes are underway. The distribution of the urban population reflects a pan-Russian trend of population concentration in major cities, regional capitals, and agglomerations. The national republics are distinguished by the specific dynamics in the scale and level of urbanization, observable for both the total population and the titular ethnic groups. The Republic of Tatarstan and the Udmurt Republic exemplify two contrasting trends: the former demonstrates a consistent increase in both the size and proportion of the urban population, whereas the latter experiences a decline. In the remaining republics, the dynamics of absolute and relative urbanization metrics are less stable, with periods of growth periodically alternating with decline, and vice versa; the nature of these changes can vary significantly.

Conclusion. A comparative regional analysis of these issues allows for an examination of how specific regional and ethnic populations are integrated into the urban milieu. This approach is instrumental in identifying prospects for socio-demographic development and in devising effective policy mechanisms for national, social, and demographic governance, aimed at safeguarding demographic potential during urbanization.

Keywords: Ural-Volga region, national Republic, urban population, urbanization, Bashkirs, Tatars, Chuvash, Mari, Mordvins, Udmurts

Funding: The article was carried out as part of a research program related to the study of the ethnocultural diversity of Russian society and aimed at strengthening the all-Russian identity in 2023‒2025 (headed by Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences V.A. Tishkov).

Conflict of interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.

For citation: Akhmetova G.F. Trends in Urbanization Processes in the National Republics of the Ural-Volga Region During the Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries. Finno–Ugric World. 2025;17(4):496‒512. https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.017.2025.04.496-512

REFERENCES

  1. Sassen S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2001. 480 р. Available at: https://clck.ru/3P4ccR (accessed 10.07.2025).
  2. Robinson J. Global and World Cities: A View from off the Map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2002;26(3):531–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00397
  3. Haase A., Rink D., Grossmann K., Bernt M., Mykhnenko V. Conceptualizing Urban Shrinkage. Environment and Planning A. 2014;46:1519–1534. https://doi.org/10.1068/a46269
  4. Fol S., Cunningham Sabot E. Urban Decline and Shrinking Cities: A Critical Assessment of Approaches to Urban Shrinkage. Annales de Geographie. 2010;4(674):359–383. https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.674.0359
  5. Vishnevsky A.G. [Sickle and Ruble: Conservative Modernization in the USSR]. Moscow; 2010. P. 78–111. (In Russ.)
  6. Nefedova T.G., Polyan P.P., Treivish A.I. [City and Village in European Russia: One Hundred Years of Change: Monograph]. Moscow; 2001. 560 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Cherkasov A.A. [Ethnic Aspects of Urbanization in Russia]. Stavropol; 2016. 240 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Uvarov S.N. The Ethnic Factor of Urbanization in Udmurtia in the Second Half of the XX Century. In: [Demographic Potential of the EAEU Countries: Collection of Articles from the VIII Ural Demographic Forum]. Vol. 1. Yekaterinburg; 2017. Р. 161–166. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  9. Ivanov V.P. [Dynamics of the Distribution and Population of the Chuvash in the Regions of Russia in the 20th Century]. Regionology. 2005;(3):191‒197. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mbbvld
  10. Soloviev E.V., Shabykov V.I. The Influence of Urbanization on the Dynamics of Linguistic Behavior of Non-Russian Ethnic Groups of the Republic of Mari El. POISK: Politika. Obshhestvovedenie. Iskusstvo. Sociologiya. Kul’tura. 2019;(75):42–51. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://elibrary.ru/lfnarc
  11. Belyaeva N.F. Modern Ethnic-Demographic Processes of Mordovian Rural Population. Humanitarian: Actual Problems of the Humanities and Education. 2017;(3):33–43. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://elibrary.ru/zigbbx
  12. Kuseev R.G., Danilko E.S. (eds) [Bashkirs]. Moscow; 2015. 662 р. (In Russ.)
  13. Mokshin N.F., Fedyanovich T.P., Khristolyubova L.S. (eds) [Peoples of the Volga and Ural regions: Komi-Zyryans. Komi-Permians. Mari. Mordvins. Udmurts]. Moscow; 2000. 579 р. (In Russ.)
  14. Urazmanova R.K., Cheshko S.V. (eds) [Tatars]. Moscow; 2001. 583 р. (In Russ.)
  15. Ivanov V.P., Korostelev A.D., Yagafova E.A. (eds) [Chuvash]. Moscow; 2017. 654 р. (In Russ.)
  16. Bushuev A.S., Gabdrakhmanova G.F., Zagidullin I.K., Izmailov B.I. [Tatars in Population Censuses]. Kazan; 2021. 75 p. (In Russ.)
  17. Safin F.G, Mukhtasarova E.A, Khaliullina A.I. Ethno-Linguistic and Ethno-Demographic Development of Finno-Ugric Nations in the Ural-Volga Region. Finno-Ugric World. 2019;11(2):152–167. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.011.2019.02.152-167
  18. Fauzer V.V. The Finno-Ugric People in the Modern World. Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies. 2011;(3):111–125. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://elibrary.ru/oqrhlt
  19. Uvarov S.N. Udmurts: Assimilation or Depopulation? (To the Results of the All-Russian Population Census of 2021). Finno-Ugric World. 2023;15(4):461–471. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://elibrary.ru/toonsd
  20. Gabdrakhmanova G.F., Alos I Font E. On the Question of Fixing the National-Language Composition of the Population in the All-Russian Population Census 2020–2021. Sociological Studies. 2024;(1):28–39. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0132162524010032
  21. Tishkov V.A. Counting the Peoples or Deconstructing Population Censuses. Ethno Review. 2023;(4):183-211. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869541523040085
  22. Chudinovskikh O.S. On the Issue of the Possibility of Studying Migration Based on the Materials of the 2020 All-Russia Population Census. Demographic Review. 2025;12(2):4–34. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v12i2.27489
  23. Chernysh M.F., Markin V.V., Baymurzina G.R. Small Towns of Russia: New Challenges, Social Problems and Prospects: Monograph. Moscow; 2021. 598 р. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-378-2.2021
  24. Rybakovsky O.L. Reproduction of the Population of the Regions of Russia in 1992–2024: Results, Components, Factors. Population. 2024;27(4):4–17. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1561-7785-2024-4-4-17

Information about the author:

Guldar F. Akhmetova, Cand.Sci. (Hist.), Senior Researcher, Ufa University of Science and Technology (32 Zaki Validi St., Ufa 450076, Russian Federation), Leading Researcher, Institute of Strategic Researches of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan (20/1 50 let Oktyabrya St., Ufa 450005, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-0246, SPIN-code: 8427-0965, aguldar@yandex.ru

The author has read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 07.04.2025; revised 25.08.2025; accepted 08.09.2025.

This entry was posted in Unrubric. Bookmark the permalink.