Abukaeva L.A. Markers of the Sacred in the Texts of Mari Prayers through the Prism of the Correlation between the Verbal and the Non-Verbal

Posted on 30.03.2026 by editor

Скачать (pdf)

Original article

https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.018.2026.01.032-044
https://elibrary.ru/bfogbe
УДК / UDC 81’42:398.32:811.511.151

Markers of the Sacred in the Texts of Mari Prayers through the Prism of the Correlation between the Verbal and the Non-Verbal

L. A. Abukaeva
Mari State University, Yoshkar-Ola, Russian Federation

Abstract

Introduction. In connection with society’s return to traditional spiritual values and the revival of prayer practices, new processes are emerging in the religious life of Mari believers. In line with contemporary trends in the social sciences and humanities (theolinguistics, linguotheology, linguoculturology, and discourse studies), it is necessary to undertake a comprehensive analysis of the religious practices and prayer texts of the Mari ethnic religion, which contain the most ancient layer of cultural codes. Their decipherment will make it possible to determine the ways and means of “translating” archaic meanings into a language accessible to the modern generation, while preserving the identity and subjectivity of the people. Despite the existence of studies in ethnography, folklore, and linguoculturology, many meanings embedded in Mari rites, rituals, and mythology remain concealed or have been misinterpreted. The aim of this study is to identify and describe markers of the sacred in prayer texts by establishing the correlation between verbal and non-verbal components within the sacred dimension of the prayer practices of the Mari ethnic religion.

Materials and Methods. The study drew on prayer texts published in nineteenth-century missionary periodicals and ethnographic literature, as well as in scholarly and popular scientific works of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries; materials from the scientific manuscript archive of the Mari Research Institute of Language, Literature and History named after V. M. Vasiliev, and the author’s field data. The research was conducted using a complex of scholarly methods, including the comparative-historical, contrastive, and descriptive approaches, as well as linguocultural analysis. Their application made it possible to elucidate the significance and semantic content of linguistic signs in their connection with the nonverbal component of rituals.

Results and Discussion. In religious rituals and prayer texts, the Mari people’s conceptions of the sacred, the divine, and that which possesses absolute value are articulated and preserved. Attitudes toward the sacred are reflected in the principles and rules governing behavior both in preparation for prayer and in the performance of the ritual itself. The observance of strict prohibitions ensures the inviolability of the sacred grove and the correctness of ritual actions. Euphemisms and periphrastic designations referring to animals and birds as offerings, according to believers’ views, make it possible to present to the gods those gifts that are deemed pleasing: lopka saŋga ‘broad forehead’ (ram); surt kÿdyr ‘domestic grouse’ (hen). By distinguishing the divine from the mundane, epithets in Mari prayer texts emphasize the purity, integrity, and inviolability of the offerings. Words denoting sacred objects and phenomena are endowed with the same epithets that function with the lexeme yumo ‘god’: oš(o) ‘white, bright’, poro ‘good’, kugu ‘great’.

Conclusion. A comprehensive analysis of the sacred texts and rituals of the Mari ethnic religion makes it possible to identify meanings and significances that are being lost, to decode the information they contain regarding value orientations, and to determine the causes underlying the transformation and desacralization of ritual practices. In the long term, research attention should be directed toward a structural-semantic analysis of stable verbal constructions and clichés that shape the composition of prayers and define the specific functioning of sacred components within ritual practice.

Keywords: Mari language, Mari ethnic religion, ritual of prayer, prayer, sacredness, markers of sacredness

Funding: The publication was prepared within the framework of the implementation of the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 25-28-00064 “Sacral texts of the Mari ethnic religion as a linguistic and cultural phenomenon”.

Conflict of interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.

For citation: Abukaeva L.A. Markers of the Sacred in the Texts of Mari Prayers through the Prism of the Correlation between the Verbal and the Non-Verbal. Finno–Ugric World. 2026;18(1):32‒44. https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.018.2026.01.032-044

REFERENCES

  1. Alekseeva Y.M. Textmental Categories of the Gospel Parable (Based on German and Russian). Philology. Theory & Practice. 2024;17(3):713‒719. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240101
  2. Astafurova T.N., Olyanitch A.V. Lingua-Semiotics of Sacredness: Sign, Word, Text. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 2009;(1):80‒87. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.elibrary.ru/kzmgxx
  3. Kazakov G.A. [Sacred Vocabulary in the Language System: Monograph]. Moscow; 2016. 142 р. (In Russ.)
  4. Vorob’eva S.N. Sacredness (Sacred) as a Constitutive Quality of Religious Discourse. Philology: Scientific Researches. 2019;(6):140‒149. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2019.6.31121
  5. Shkuran O.V. Language Units with Sacred Semantics: Linguoculturological and Lexicographic Aspects. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics. 2019.10(2):336‒352. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ztkkcu
  6. Pashkov S.M. Sacredness as a Factor of Text Formation in Religious Communication. Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Ser.: Linguistics. 2023;(1):90–99. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712X-2023-1-90-99
  7. Pashkov S.M. Sacredness as a Category of Religious Consciousness in Lexicosemantic Perspective: The Case of the English Language. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2024;(213):276‒288. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2024-213-276-288
  8. Cook C. Psychiatry in Scripture: Sacred Texts and Psychopathology. The Psychiatrist. 2012;36(6):225‒229. https://doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2024-213-276-288
  9. Stein G. The Hidden Psychiatry of the Old Testament. Hamilton Books (Rowman & Littlefield); 2018. 610 p. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.210
  10. Stein G. Did Ezekiel Have First-Rank Symptoms? The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;194(6):551. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.194.6.551
  11. Hannabuss S. The Hidden Psychiatry of the Old Testament By George Stein. Hamilton Books (Rowman & Littlefield). 2018. 610 pp. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2020;216(2):121. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.210
  12. Popov N.S. To the Question of Formation and Development of Mari Traditional Religion. Finno-Ugrovedenie. 2020;(61):148–157 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) Available at: https://marnii.ru/zhurnal/vypuski/ (accessed 20.08.2025).
  13. Kaliev Yu.A. [Mari Mythological Consciousness. Phenomenology of Traditional Worldview: Monograph]. Yoshkar-Ola; 2003. 216 р. (In Russ.) Available at: https://clck.ru/3RqrGq (accessed 20.08.2025).
  14. Abukaeva L.A. [The Conceptosphere of the Mari Ethnic Religion: Monograph]. Yoshkar-Ola; 2024. Р. 7‒9. (In Russ.)
  15. Kudryavtsev V.G. Cult Places of Mari as a Symbol of Cultural Identity. Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies. 2019;13(4):678‒687. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.35634/2224-9443-2019-13-4-678-687
  16. Shutova N.I. Sacred Sites of the Mari in Udmurtia and Udmurt Chapels: The Problems of Study. In: [Mari Traditional Religion: History and Modernity: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the Year of the Cultural Heritage of the Peoples of Russia]. Yoshkar-Ola; 2022. P. 50‒72. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.51254/978-5-94950-120-7_2022_03
  17. Konovalova N.I. Creative Syncretism of Speech Genres of Threat and Appeasement in Sacred Texts of Traditional Folk Culture. Ural Journal of Philology. Ser.: Language. System. Personality: Linguistics of creativity. 2020;29(2):257‒269. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.26170/ufv20-02-23
  18. Abukaeva L.A. [Prohibitions in the Mari Worldview System: Monograph]. Yoshkar-Ola; 2018. Р. 33‒65. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/yrowaz
  19. Abukayeva L.A. Worship Bans in the Mari System of Thoughts. Vestnik of the Mari State University. 2014;(2):72‒76. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.elibrary.ru/tdupql
  20. Tolstaya S.M. [The Image of the World in Text and Ritual: Monograph]. Moscow; 2015. 528 р. (In Russ.)
  21. Sadikov R.R., Minniyakhmetova T.G. Things in the Space of Udmurt Sacrifices: On the Border of the Utilitarian and the Sacred. Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies. 2022;16(2):295–305 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.35634/2224-9443-2022-16-2-295-305
  22. Abukaeva L.A. Mari People – Silver People: Information Potential of the Mari Word Shi ‘Silver / Silvery’. Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies. 2025;19(2):156–163. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.35634/2224-9443-2025-19-2-156-163

Information about the author:

Lyubov A. Abukaeva, Dr.Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Head of the Center of Uralic Languages Studies, Mari State University (1 Lenin Square, Yoshkar-Ola 424000, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9622-6770, SPIN-code: 2749-3625, sylne@mail.ru

The author has read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 19.09.2025; revised 29.10.2025; accepted 06.11.2025.

This entry was posted in Unrubric. Bookmark the permalink.