Saberov R.A., Shizhensky R.V. The Formation of a Spiritual Hierarchy in the Process of Institutionalization of Clergyin the Mari Traditional Religion (20th–21st Centuries)

Posted on 28.12.2025 by editor

Download (pdf)

Original article

https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.017.2025.04.454-469
https://elibrary.ru/fjdbjb
УДК / UDC 94:2-725

The Formation of a Spiritual Hierarchy in the Process of Institutionalization of Clergyin the Mari Traditional Religion (20th–21st Centuries)

R. A. Saberov
National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, Moscow, Russian Federation
Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation

R. V. Shizhensky
Pushkin Leningrad State University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration,Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation

Abstract

Introduction. The organizational and legal formalization of the Mari Traditional Religion’s administrative system, which began in the 20th century, achieved legitimate status in the early 21st century with the establishment of the Centralized Religious Organization of the Mari Traditional Religion in the Republic of Mari El. A key research problem is the absence in scholarly discourse of both legal and field-based sources that reflect the evolutionary mechanisms behind the formation of the Mari ethnic religion’s organizational structure during this period. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for preserving cultural identity, ensuring the legal protection of prayer leaders, developing effective governance models, and adapting traditional practices to contemporary social and legislative realities. The aim of this study is to define the trajectory of development for the organizational and legal forms of the Mari traditional priesthood in the 21st century.

Materials and Methods. This study is based on archival records, field ethnographical materials, as well as the foundational documents of centralized organizations and local communities of the Mari traditional religion. In their work, the authors employed the principles of historicism, civilizational and systemic approaches, source analysis of documentary materials, the hermeneutic method, and the case-study method. This methodological framework enabled the identification of the specific characteristics in the development of the institution of clergy within the Mari traditional religion during the period under investigation.

Results and Discussion. The revival of the Mari traditional religion in the 1990s was accompanied by the establishment of an institutional structure and a hierarchical system of clergy. By the end of the second decade of the 21st century, a stable, multi-level hierarchical system had taken shape. This system includes the legal formalization of the clergy’s status and mechanisms for interaction with state institutions. Currently, the search continues for legal models to support and legitimize the activities of clergy serving local religious communities within the Mari ethno-religion. The findings indicate a historical continuity in the evolution of the Mari ethnic tradition and its organizational-legal forms, aligned with the objectives of harmonizing state-confessional relations in the Russian Federation.

Conclusion. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the revival of the Mari Traditional Religion in the Republic of Mari El has been characterized by a significant strengthening of its institutional structures and organizational components. By the end of the 2010s, a stable hierarchy of clerical activity had been established. This process of institutionalization is attributed not only to the legal formalization of the clergy’s status but also to the creation of an administrative apparatus within the Centralized Religious Association of the Mari Traditional Religion in the Republic of Mari El. These developments have contributed to a more structured religious system, enhancing its legitimacy and efficacy in performing religious functions. The findings of this study can inform the development of state-confessional relations at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Furthermore, they may serve as a starting point for expanding the geographical scope of research in search of new primary sources on this subject.

Keywords: Mari traditional religion, religious minister, hierarchy of religious ministers, religious organization, legal registration

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

For citation: Saberov R.A., Shizhensky R.V. The Formation of a Spiritual Hierarchy in the Process of Institutionalization of Clergyin the Mari Traditional Religion (20th–21st Centuries). Finno–Ugric World. 2025;17(4):454‒469. https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.017.2025.04.454-469

REFERENCES

  1. Abukaeva L.A. [The Conceptosphere of the Mari Ethnic Religion]. Yoshkar-Ola; 2024. 364 р. (In Russ.)
  2. Alybina T. I. [Transformation of the Mari Religious Tradition in the Post-Soviet Period: Dissertation … Dr.Sci. (Philos.)]. Tartu; 2017. 219 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Kutsaeva M.V. [Orthodox Pagan Syncretism in the Religious Life of the Mari Diaspora of the Moscow Region]. Zhivaya starina. 2023;(1):46–50. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/vytzla
  4. Sadikov R.R., Ilikaev A.S. On Issue of Defining Religious Systems of Finno-Ugriс Peoples of Volga Region. Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies. 2023;17(3):408–418. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.elibrary.ru/fuzhno
  5. Pozdeev I.L. Mari of Udmurtia: Factors of Preserving Traditional Culture in Modern Conditions. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(12):380–395. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-12-380-395
  6. Egorov V.A. [Mari Traditional Religion and Modern Art]. Personality. Culture. Society. 2024;26(1–2):71–78. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/dlikcb
  7. Saberov R.A. Exploring the Developmental Trajectory of the Institution of Clergy in the Mari Traditional Religion in the 1950s–1960s (Based on Materials from the Mari Research Institute of Language, Literature, and History). Finno-Ugric World. 2025;17(1):90‒98. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.017.2025.01.090-098
  8. Shizhensky R.V., Saberov R.A. [On the Question of the Functional Features of Religious Leaders of Modern Paganism: Russian-Mari Parallels]. Kazanskaya nauka. 2015;(9):61‒63. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/umeuyj
  9. Shkalina G.E. [The Sacred World of the Mari]. Yoshkar-Ola; 2019. 303 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Popov N.S. To the Question of Formation and Development of Mari Traditional Religion. Finno-Ugrovedenie. 2020;(61):148‒157. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.elibrary.ru/rcowjv
  11. Chemyshev E.V. Traditional Mari Beliefs at the Turn of the XX‒XXI Centuries. Bulletin of the Research Institute of Humanities by the Government of the Republic of Mordovia. 2021;(1):109–119. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.elibrary.ru/zmwgyh
  12. Ustyantsev H.Yu. Religious and Mythological Beliefs of the Mari Priesthood. Gods, Souls and Other Worlds. Folklore: Structure, Typology, Semiotics. 2025;8(2):10–30. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2025-8-2-10-30
  13. Egorov V.A. Autochthonous Mari Traditional Religion as a Possible All-Russian Traditional Religion. In: Shizhensky R.V. (ed) [Paganism in Modern Russia: Experience of Interdisciplinary Research]. Kaliningrad; 2023. P. 40‒54. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://www.elibrary.ru/zyjnuw
  14. Hoppal M. [Shamans – Cultures – Signs]. Tartu; 2015. 240 p. (In Russ.)
  15. Harva W. [Beliefs and Mythology of the Peoples of Northern Eurasia]. Moscow; 2022. 354 p. (In Russ.)
  16. Luerhmann S. Recycling Cultural Construction: Desecularisation in Postsoviet Mari El. Religion, State & Society. 2005;33(1): 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963749042000330857
  17. Luerhmann S. A Dual Struggle of Images on Russia’s Middle Volga: Icon Veneration in the Face of Protestant and Pagan Critique. In: Ch. Hann, H. Goltz (eds) Eastern Christians in Anthropological Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2010. Р. 56‒78.
  18. Khvastunova Yu.V. [Modern Tengrianism (on the Example of V. A. Sat’s Version of Tengrianism in the Altai Republic)]. Colloquium Heptaplomeres. 2018;(5):33–43. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/vrvbog
  19. Kataeva E.Yu., Nikitina O.N. [Udmurt Paganism in the Republic of the Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries]. In: [Humanities: Issues and Development Trends: Collection of Scientific Papers Based on the Results of the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Issue IV. Krasnoyarsk; 2017. P. 14‒19. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/zxlqtf
  20. Abukayeva L.A. The Prayer Invocations of Adherents of the Mari Ethnic Religion: Forms and Meanings. Finno-Ugric World. 2025;17(2):140‒151. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.15507/2076-2577.017.2025.02.140-151

Information about the аuthors:

Rushan А. Saberov, Senior Lecturer of the Departments of Social Sciences and Technologies, National University of Science and Technology “MISIS” (bld. 1, 4 Leninsky Prospekt, Moscow 119049, Russian Federation), Departments of Russian History and Auxiliary Historical Disciplines, Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University (1 Ulyanova St., Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1502-3718, SPIN-code: 3600-9212, saberow@yandex.ru

Roman V. Shizhensky, Dr.Sci. (Philos.), Chief Scientific Officer of the Scientific Research Center for Religious Studies and Ethnopolitical Studies, Pushkin Leningrad State University (bld. A, 10 Petersburg highway, St. Petersburg 196605, Russian Federation), Head of the Research Laboratory of Ethno-Religious Research, Nizhny Novgorod branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (46 Gagarin Avenue, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russian Federation), ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8765-2241, SPIN-code: 8358-7337, heit@inbox.ru

Authors’ contribution:

R. A. Saberov – ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims; development of methodology; conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the data; preparation and creation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation); preparation and creation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision – including pre- or post-publication stages; presentation of the published work, specifically data visualization.

R. V. Shizhensky – ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims; oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team; conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the data; preparation and creation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision – including pre- or post-publication stages; verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the reproducibility of results and other research outputs and other research outputs.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Submitted 11.08.2025; revised 29.09.2025; accepted 03.10.2025.

This entry was posted in Unrubric. Bookmark the permalink.