Kolcheva Elvira M.,
Candidate Sc. {Arts History}, Assistant Professor, Department of Social and Cultural Technologies, Mari State University (Yoshkar-Ola, Russia), elviramk@mail.ru
The article makes the attempt of cultural-psychological analysis of the Mari mythological image of the Heavenly Virgin Yumynÿdyr based on post-Jungian modern psychoanalytic typology of psychological (role-playing) archetypes.
Keywords: Celestial Virgin Yumynÿdyr; gender archetype; Mari traditional culture; post-Jungian analytical psychology.
1. Bednenko, G. B. (2013), Gods and goddesses as role archetypes, Moscow: Spinners (Prakhi).
2. Bohlen, D. Sh. (2008), Goddess in every woman: The new psychology of women. Archetypes goddesses, Moscow: Sofia, available: http://psylib.org.ua/books/bolen01/index.htm [accessed 28 June 2016].
3. Kaliev, Yu. A. (2003), Mythological consciousness of Mari: Phenomenology of the traditional perception of the world, a monograph, Yoshkar-Ola: Mari State University.
4. Kolcheva, E. M. (2015), Notion of “cultural archetype” as a tool of analysis of the national art, Knowledge. Comprehension. Skill, № 1, p. 254–263.
5. Molotova, T. L. (1992), Mari folk costume, Yoshkar-Ola: Mari Book Press.
6. Popov, N. S. and Smirnov, I. N. (2013), Wedding, The Mari. Historical and ethnographic essays, ed. 2nd, Yoshkar-Ola: MarNIIIYaLI.
7. Sokolova, M. V. (2015), Specific features of gender identity of Mari women (based on the novel Z. Katkova), Finno-Ugric world, № 1, p. 56–61.
8. Toydybekova, L. S. (2007), Mari mythology: ethnographic research, Yoshkar-Ola: MPIK.
9. Henderson, J. (2007), Cultural unconscious, Psychological analysis of cultural attitudes, Moscow: Dobrosvet; KDU, p. 149–164.